| ANNUALIZED SINCE INCEPTION | QUARTERLY | YTD |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | - |
Harris | Oakmark's 1Q 2026 commentary argues that market narratives are forming faster and more broadly since COVID, driven by passive flows and momentum strategies. This creates opportunities when broad narratives miss fundamental distinctions. In software, AI is viewed as an existential threat across the entire sector, but many businesses retain high switching costs and pricing power, with AI potentially strengthening rather than replacing systems. Commercial insurance faces similar broad-brush treatment despite complex commercial risk still requiring expertise and relationships. Hyperscalers are viewed through a binary lens of capital intensity, but these companies retain significant flexibility with cash-generative core businesses and discretionary AI investments. Private credit has swung from overlooked risks to systemic risk concerns, but differs significantly from pre-crisis mortgage markets in scale and financial system embedding. The manager sees opportunities in insurance names, investment-grade asset managers, and software companies where narratives have created attractive entry points despite strong underlying fundamentals.
Market narratives are forming more quickly and being applied more broadly since COVID, flattening important distinctions between companies and causing prices to diverge from fundamentals, creating opportunities for patient investors focused on issuer-level detail in sectors like software, commercial insurance, and hyperscalers.
The manager expects narratives will likely form even faster and with broader reach, driven by increasing transparency, real-time information, and continued retail-ization and passive-ication of markets. AI-related existential narratives will continue to claim entire sectors as victims, and new doomsday scenarios will continue to emerge, creating opportunities for detailed fundamental analysis.
| Date | Letter | Tickers | Keywords | Pitches | Quick Takes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31 2026 | 2026 Q1 | ORCL | AI, credit, fixed income, fundamentals, insurance, narratives, opportunity, software | ORCL | Market narratives are forming faster and broader since COVID, creating opportunities when prices diverge from fundamentals. AI fears are painting entire sectors with broad strokes, missing distinctions between companies with strong switching costs versus those truly at risk. Similar dynamics in commercial insurance, hyperscalers, and private credit create entry points for patient fundamental investors. |
| Jan 8 2026 | 2025 Q4 | - | credit, Discipline, fixed income, risk management, selectivity, Valuations | - | Harris Oakmark warns that tight credit spreads and calm markets mask underlying risks including geopolitical tensions and softening credit metrics. The firm maintains conservative positioning while selectively targeting non-agency securitization and oversold corporate credit in quality sectors, emphasizing discipline over deployment when valuations leave little room for disappointment. |
| Oct 7 2025 | 2025 Q3 | ARE, CNC, CVS, ELV, UNH | credit, fixed income, fundamentals, healthcare, Simplicity, value |
ARE US CNC US CVS US |
Harris Oakmark advocates simplicity in fixed income investing, avoiding macro forecasting complexity in favor of durable fundamentals. They see value in healthcare credits like Alexandria Real Estate, Centene, and CVS, which trade at spreads implying permanent impairment despite strong competitive positions and balance sheets. The strategy focuses on clear investment theses that can withstand various economic outcomes. |
| Jun 30 2025 | 2025 Q2 | - | Behavioral Finance, credit, fixed income, high yield, Spreads, uncertainty | - | Abbas views April's credit spread widening as market overreaction to uncertainty, adding 12 percentage points of credit risk. He argues uncertainty creates opportunity when mispriced, not inherent risk. The firm invested in cruise lines and private jets with strong fundamentals trading at attractive valuations. Staying invested through volatility historically outperforms timing attempts. |
| Mar 31 2025 | 2025 Q1 | PODD | credit, fixed income, high yield, Spreads, tariffs, value | PODD | Oakmark Fixed Income is deploying capital after credit markets finally priced uncertainty, ending years of defensive positioning. High yield and investment-grade spreads have meaningfully widened, creating value opportunities. The team selectively adds credit risk exposure while maintaining liquidity, focusing on companies with strong management teams rather than predicting macro outcomes. |
| Jan 8 2025 | 2024 Q4 | - | Bonds, credit, Federal Reserve, fixed income, inflation, Mortgage, rates, Treasury | - | Oakmark sees 2025 fixed income as complicated but investable, with fiscal deficit fears overblown given market resilience and structural demand. Near-5% yields offer attractive income as the Fed prioritizes credibility over quick cuts. Opportunities exist in leveraged loans, agency MBS, and selective credit through disciplined fundamental analysis rather than macro timing. |
| Oct 9 2024 | 2024 Q3 | CHX | credit, fixed income, fundamentals, management, Quality, risk management, value | - | Oakmark's fixed income strategy emphasizes fundamental analysis over macro predictions, focusing on strong management teams, solid business fundamentals, and buying securities at discounts to intrinsic value. Using ChampionX as an example of quality management execution, the firm maintains conviction in their value-oriented approach despite elevated credit spreads and geopolitical uncertainties, believing fundamentals ultimately drive long-term returns. |
| Jun 30 2024 | 2024 Q2 | - | Bonds, demand, Fed, fixed income, rates, supply, Treasuries | - | Harris Associates argues bond supply fears are overblown and fundamentals drive returns. With $6 trillion parked in money markets and Fed rate cuts coming, massive liquidity will flow back into bonds. At elevated real yields above 2%, bonds are well-positioned for diversification and protection during economic slowdowns, rising phoenix-like from 2022's rate reset. |
| Apr 15 2024 | 2024 Q1 | - | credit, fixed income, inflation, rates, value, volatility | - | Abbas sees compelling fixed income opportunities driven by high starting yields that provide resilient returns regardless of inflation outcomes. Current real yields offer substantial buffers against defaults and rate volatility. Despite perceived expensive credit spreads, elevated yields create attractive risk-adjusted returns for patient capital over five to seven years, making fixed income fundamentally attractive for long-term investors. |
| Aug 1 2024 | 2023 Q4 | - | active management, Bond Funds, Credit Risk, fixed income, Institutional Access, interest rates | - | Harris Associates warns against retail investors buying individual bonds despite higher rates. Credit analysis complexity, 40% default recovery rates, institutional access restrictions (81% of high-yield bonds unavailable), and poor retail pricing make professionally managed funds superior. Oakmark finds best opportunities in leveraged loans and securitized products inaccessible to individuals, advocating active management for risk-adjusted returns. |
| QUARTER | THEMES | TAGS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 |
AIAI is increasingly framed as an existential risk across entire sectors, particularly software. The market narrative has moved quickly from viewing software businesses as durable to treating the entire category as at risk of dying overnight. However, many businesses continue to exhibit high switching costs, strong retention, and pricing power, with AI potentially strengthening rather than replacing these systems. |
Software Disruption Technology Automation Enterprise |
Private CreditPrivate credit narrative has swung from overlooked risks to being viewed as a source of systemic risk, often compared to pre-2008 mortgage-backed securities. However, the scale is much smaller at $2 trillion globally versus $7.2 trillion for pre-crisis mortgage securitization, and it's not embedded in the financial system as a core funding mechanism. |
Credit Liquidity Underwriting Leverage Restructuring | |
CloudHyperscalers face binary discussions around capital intensity with assumptions that elevated AI investment will inevitably lead to poor outcomes for creditors. However, these companies retain significant flexibility with highly cash-generative core businesses and discretionary future investment that can be adjusted if demand falls short or returns compress. |
Infrastructure Investment Flexibility Cash Flow Technology | |
| 2025 Q4 |
Credit StressManager emphasizes that strong valuations do not mean low risk, with credit spreads near historically tight levels despite softening issuer leverage metrics. Investment-grade spreads at 80 basis points and high-yield at 290 basis points leave little room for disappointment. Compensation for corporate default risk sits near tight end of historical ranges. |
Credit Spreads Default Risk Corporate Bonds Leverage Valuations |
Private CreditGrowing role of private credit creates different liquidity, valuation, and reporting dynamics that can slow feedback loops and delay recognition of underlying issues. While not yet systemically important due to size, it is increasingly intertwined with major fixed income benchmark issuers. When feedback is muted, price discovery tends to arrive later and more abruptly. |
Private Credit Liquidity Price Discovery Valuation Feedback | |
Risk AppetiteMarkets are not broadly pricing stress despite geopolitical tensions and other risks. Manager notes overconfidence born of seemingly benign conditions can create incremental risk. The costliest mistakes in fixed income tend to occur when conditions look easy, not difficult. |
Risk Pricing Market Complacency Overconfidence Stress Valuations | |
| 2025 Q3 |
HealthcareThe market is offering yields above Treasuries for healthcare businesses as if they are permanently impaired, despite strong balance sheets and competitive positions. Healthcare credits like Alexandria Real Estate, Centene, and CVS represent durable franchises trading at spreads that more than compensate for their risk, with temporary headwinds creating value opportunities. |
Managed Care Healthcare REITs PBMs Medicaid Medicare Advantage |
| 2025 Q2 |
Credit StressCredit spreads widened sharply in April despite many issuers having unchanged fundamentals. The manager views this as excessive market reaction to uncertainty, creating mispriced opportunities. They added 12 percentage points of credit risk during this period, buying what they consider mispriced probability rather than certainty. |
Credit Spreads High Yield Default Risk Bond Math Mispricing |
Risk AppetiteThe manager argues that uncertainty doesn't inherently reduce expected returns but simply widens the range of outcomes. They advocate staying invested through periods of fear and volatility rather than attempting to time markets, as investors are often penalized more for missing recoveries than enduring drawdowns. |
Uncertainty Volatility Market Timing Expected Returns Behavioral Bias | |
TravelThe portfolio includes investments in a domestic cruise line company and a U.S.-based private jet manufacturer. These companies were valued at attractive levels despite having well-insulated business models and strong forward visibility, representing opportunities created by market overreaction to uncertainty. |
Cruise Lines Private Jets Travel Recovery Business Models Valuation | |
| 2025 Q1 |
Credit StressCredit markets are finally pricing in uncertainty after an extended period of complacency. High yield spreads have widened to +375 basis points, almost 100 basis points off the tights, while investment-grade BBB credit has widened to around +120 basis points. This repricing creates opportunities for value investors as risk premiums begin to reflect reality. |
Credit Spreads High Yield Investment Grade Risk Premium |
Trade PolicyTariff uncertainty is driving market volatility and creating dislocations. Headlines about widespread, large tariffs expected to be implemented are contributing to uncertainty pricing. The manager acknowledges tariffs are real and have potential to shift earnings and raise default risk, requiring focus on companies that can absorb this reset through cash flow and balance sheet strength. |
Tariffs Trade Policy Uncertainty Earnings | |
ValueAfter years of aggressive pricing with minimal compensation for credit risk, value opportunities are finally emerging. The team has been defensive for two years but is now beginning to put capital to work where risk premiums reflect reality. Dislocations are surfacing that meet Oakmark's bar for both return potential and margin of safety. |
Value Mispricing Opportunity Margin of Safety Return Potential | |
| 2024 Q4 |
RatesThe Fed's challenge in 2025 lies in navigating uncertainties while maintaining credibility. Rate-driven capital appreciation will likely take a backseat to steady, reliable income streams. A measured Fed reinforces income as the primary driver of returns in the current environment. |
Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Interest Rates Income Duration |
InflationFiscal policies aimed at reshoring initiatives, tariffs and restrictions on low-cost immigrant labor carry long-term risks that could embed structural inflationary pressures into the economy. Geopolitical factors further complicate the inflation outlook. |
Price Stability Fiscal Policy Tariffs Supply Chain Geopolitical | |
CreditCredit spreads near historic lows leave little room for error in evaluating default risks. Success hinges on avoiding poor risk-reward dynamics and focusing on individual credit stories where markets misprice credit relative to default risks. |
Credit Spreads Default Risk Corporate Bonds Credit Selection High Yield | |
MortgageAgency mortgage-backed securities present significant value with spreads relative to corporate credit remaining historically wide. As rate volatility stabilizes, the convexity challenges that have weighed on MBS are likely to ease. |
Agency MBS Mortgage Backed Securities Convexity Rate Volatility Relative Value | |
| 2024 Q3 |
ValueOakmark focuses on purchasing securities at a discount to their intrinsic value, ensuring they build in a margin of safety. They believe fundamentals drive long-term value regardless of broader market behavior, emphasizing careful analysis of company cash flows, balance sheets and business models. |
Discount Intrinsic Value Margin of Safety Fundamentals Cash Flow |
QualityThe firm invests in companies with strong, proven leaders who act like owners and make shareholder-aligned decisions across market cycles. They seek management teams that consistently deliver results driven by long-term strategic vision through good and bad times. |
Management Leadership Shareholder Aligned Long-term Vision Proven Track Record | |
| 2024 Q2 |
RatesThe manager argues that fundamentals drive bond returns more than supply concerns. As the Fed begins cutting rates, money parked in short-term Treasuries and money markets will likely flow back into bonds. Real yields above 2% position bonds to provide better protection during economic downturns. |
Fed Yields Treasuries Money Markets Rate Cuts |
LiquidityApproximately $6 trillion sits in money market assets earning over 5% from short-term Treasuries, plus over $1 trillion in high quality fixed income parked in short-duration positions. This massive liquidity pool will likely flow back into bonds as Fed cuts rates and prospective returns in short-term assets decline. |
Money Markets Cash Short Duration Asset Flows Reallocation | |
| 2024 Q1 |
RatesManager argues that short-term Fed actions and rate volatility should not distract from long-term fixed income opportunities. Higher starting yields create resilient expected returns regardless of whether rates normalize at 2% or 3% inflation. Periods of high rate volatility historically predict above-average future returns. |
Interest Rates Fed Policy Yield Volatility Duration |
InflationWhether inflation remains at 3% or falls to the Fed's 2% target does not fundamentally change the attractiveness of fixed income investing. The manager presents data showing that both scenarios support positive real returns for buy-and-hold investors over seven-year periods. |
CPI Real Returns Purchasing Power Price Stability | |
Credit StressDespite narrow credit spreads appearing expensive historically, elevated real yields provide substantial buffer against defaults. Investment-grade corporates could withstand defaults nearly four times historical averages while still delivering average real returns to buy-and-hold investors. |
Credit Spreads Default Risk Recovery Rates Investment Grade High Yield | |
| 2023 Q4 |
Credit StressThe manager emphasizes default risk as a critical concern in fixed income investing, noting that the average recovery on defaulted corporate bonds since 1990 was only 40%. Warren Buffett's warning about reaching for yield being stupid but human is highlighted, as high yields often correlate with higher bankruptcy risk. The concentration risk from defaults can destroy years of yield in individual bond portfolios. |
Default Risk Credit Analysis Bankruptcy Recovery Rates High Yield |
RatesHigher interest rates make individual bonds more appealing with higher semi-annual payments, but create significant interest rate risk. The manager notes they are in an era of unusually high interest rate volatility leading to greater price fluctuations. As rates rise, existing bond values typically fall, posing substantial risk especially if selling before maturity becomes necessary. |
Interest Rates Rate Volatility Duration Risk Bond Pricing Yield | |
InflationInflation is identified as particularly relevant in the current economic climate, significantly eroding the real value of bond returns. The manager suggests retail investors may not fully grasp the implications of real versus inflation-adjusted returns, making professional management valuable for adjusting exposures based on market conditions. |
Real Returns Purchasing Power Inflation Protection Real Yields |
| Date | Pitch Type | Author | Ticker | Company | Industry | Sub Industry | Bull / Bear | Exchange | Keywords | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026 | Fund Letters | Oakmark Fixed Income | ORCL | Oracle Corporation | Software - Infrastructure | Systems Software | Bull | NASDAQ | AI investment, cash flow generation, cloud infrastructure, Convertible Bonds, Enterprise software, Investment grade credit, technology | Login |
| Oct 7, 2025 | Fund Letters | Adam Abbas | ARE US | Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. | Real Estate | Office REIT | Bull | NYSE | balance sheet, Biotech, Credit, Life-science, Real Estate, REIT, valuation | Login |
| Oct 7, 2025 | Fund Letters | Adam Abbas | CNC US | Centene Corp. | Health Care | Managed Care | Bull | NYSE | healthcare, managed care, Margins, Medicaid, turnaround, valuation | Login |
| Oct 7, 2025 | Fund Letters | Adam Abbas | CVS US | CVS Health Corp. | Health Care | Health Care Services | Bull | NYSE | deleveraging, healthcare, Insurance, Margins, Pbm, Regulatory, valuation | Login |
| Mar 31, 2025 | Fund Letters | Oakmark Fixed Income | PODD | Insulet Corporation | Health Care | Health Care Equipment | Bull | NASDAQ | Bond, capital structure, Credit, Diabetes, Free Cash Flow, healthcare, high yield, Insulin delivery, Medical devices | Login |
| TICKER | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|
| ORCL | Oracle is a good example. While equity outcomes may span a wide range, we believe credit outcomes are more bounded. Oracle generates strong core cash flows relative to its debt, and it has acted to protect its investment-grade rating, even using its equity as currency—an action that may dilute its equity value but supports its creditors. Oracle's future AI infrastructure investments are discretionary, not the fixed obligations they are often framed as. If demand does not meet expectations or returns normalize, the company has the flexibility to scale back, pace investment, or pursue more capital-efficient partnerships across the broader ecosystem. |
| Ticker | Put/Call | Amount Bought | Shares Bought | % Change | Weight % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Recent Buys Data | |||||
| Ticker | Put/Call | Amount Sold | Shares Sold | % Change | Weight % | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Recent Sells Data | ||||||
| Industry | Prev Quarter % | Current Quarter % | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| No industry data available | |||
