Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 20, 2026
The Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund's Class I shares delivered a net return of -1.31% for the third quarter of 2026, bringing year-to-date net return to 1.30%. The strategy significantly outperformed its primary benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, which fell -3.51% net in the quarter and is down -2.91% net year-to-date. Outperformance was generated primarily through shorter duration positioning and elevated income generation across securitized assets. Securitized credit returned -0.2% and represented 69% of assets, while corporate allocations returned -0.8% across a 13% weighting, and government exposure returned -3.8% at 16% of assets. Cash and equivalents stood at 0.7% at quarter-end. The manager's macroeconomic regime highlights an economy displaying resilient headline activity alongside softening consumer momentum in a K-shaped pattern. The Federal Reserve's restrictive stance and a sharp 80-basis-point increase in the 10-year Treasury yield to 5.29% pressured duration-heavy fixed income sectors. However, Angel Oak views widening spreads and elevated interest rates as creating an attractive prospective 6% to 10% expected return environment over the next 12 months for high-quality structured credit, without anticipating any systemic rise in broader credit stress. Portfolio activity reflected strategic reallocations toward non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, which expanded by 1% to 42.1% of assets, supported by resilient homeowner equity exceeding $30 trillion and low existing mortgage coupon rates averaging 4.9%. The manager maintained a 15.5% weighting in agency mortgage-backed securities while shifting selectively toward floating-rate agency commercial MBS. Asset-backed securities represented 13.0% of assets, while collateralized loan obligations stood at 9.2%, outperforming peer aggregates through floating-rate cash flows and disciplined tranche selection.
Capitalize on high-yielding, resilient securitized credit and seasoned homeowner debt that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns and duration insulation relative to corporate credit.
The team projects credit selection will become essential moving into 2027, expecting higher-quality securitized debt, non-agency RMBS, and floating-rate CLOs to outperform over the subsequent 12 months.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.