Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 22, 2026
During the third quarter of 2026, the Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite returned -0.09% net of fees (+0.41% pure gross), underperforming the 2.61% gain of the Russell 1000 Value Index and the 2.30% advance of the S&P 500 Index. On a year-to-date basis, the strategy gained 1.24% net of fees (+2.75% pure gross) compared to 19.27% for the value benchmark. Relative underperformance was primarily driven by negative security selection across Information Technology, Materials, and Communication Services, while positive selection in Financials and an underweight in Consumer Discretionary offered modest offsetting tailwinds. Management highlighted significant structural distortion in the benchmark environment following the June Russell reconstitution, where mega-cap technology entries expanded Information Technology from 12% to 21% of the index while Communication Services shrank to 3%. Furthermore, extreme factor dispersion characterized the market, with the highest-beta quintile of the Russell 1000 Value advancing roughly 53% over the prior six months while the lowest-beta quintile retreated 2%. Aristotle maintains that market leadership has been excessively concentrated, with the top twenty contributors generating 76% of the benchmark's year-to-date return, masking underlying market fragility. Portfolio turnover remained disciplined and focused on capital reallocation toward businesses exhibiting widening gaps between operational fundamentals and compressed multiples. The strategy initiated a new high-conviction position in HVAC manufacturer Carrier Global, financed through the complete sale of specialty vehicle producer Oshkosh following thesis realization. Top relative detractors included Martin Marietta Materials and Microchip Technology, while biopharma giant Amgen and integrated energy leader Chevron served as key positive contributors during the period.
Aristotle Value Equity seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in high-quality, cash-generative businesses trading at attractive valuations due to temporary market dislocations rather than fundamental impairment.
Management believes the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio's prospective return potential as valuation multiples compress despite continued earnings growth.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Aristotle Value Equity Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.