Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Sep 30, 2026
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional Class Shares delivered a -0.70% net return for the third quarter of 2026, underperforming the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology Index Net benchmark return of 4.50%. Strategy relative underperformance was primarily driven by adverse security selection, specifically lagging performance across semiconductor capital equipment holdings alongside an underweight posture in software equities that staged a sharp rebound during the quarter. Technology hardware and semiconductor weightings remained the strategy's primary capital allocation anchors, representing over 51% of net assets. The broader market backdrop witnessed decisive monetary policy tightening as persistent inflation compelled the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates by 25 basis points to a target range of 3.75%-4.00%, driving the 10-year Treasury yield up 87 basis points above 5%. Geopolitical instability across the Middle East triggered a 40% surge in Brent crude oil prices, contributing to cross-asset volatility and rate-driven valuation pressure. Within technology, market sentiment experienced a pronounced rotation away from semiconductor and memory infrastructure plays toward enterprise software applications, reversing first-half performance dynamics. Portfolio contributors were led by Microsoft, which benefited from accelerating cloud infrastructure demand, alongside strong performance from CrowdStrike, Palantir, and Meta Platforms as artificial intelligence monetization shifted toward enterprise software and consumer applications. Conversely, performance was weighed down by pullbacks in wafer fab equipment providers Lam Research and Applied Materials, alongside optical connectivity supplier Corning and memory manufacturer Western Digital, as investors questioned the cyclical durability and capital expenditure trajectories of hyperscalers.
The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in leading global technology franchises positioned across secular growth vectors such as artificial intelligence infrastructure, enterprise software, advanced robotics, quantum computing, and defense technology.
Management believes the market is in the early innings of long-term secular growth across artificial intelligence, advanced robotics, quantum computing, and defense technology, and will utilize market volatility to allocate capital into higher-conviction ideas.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.