Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 19, 2026
The Conestoga SMid Cap Composite returned -8.65% net of fees in the third quarter of 2026, outperforming the Russell 2500 Growth Index benchmark return of -10.35%. Year-to-date, the strategy has returned -12.23% net of fees compared to +7.28% for the benchmark. While high-beta, momentum-driven market leadership weakened considerably, higher-quality company attributes—such as robust margins and lower beta—helped protect capital on a relative basis. Negative sector performance was heavily concentrated in Industrials, which slid 16% across the benchmark, though positive stock selection and overweight positioning in Software and Health Care suppliers partially cushioned broad equity declines. Cash stood at 3.1% of assets at quarter-end. Macroeconomic crosscurrents dominated the quarter as persistent inflation prints, resilient labor market conditions, and crude oil spiking above $101 per barrel due to Middle East tensions pushed Treasury yields across the 10- and 30-year curves to 25-year highs. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by 25 basis points in September to a 3.75%-4.00% target range. Although premium-multiple growth stocks faced valuation compression, Conestoga maintains that the market's transition to a mid-cycle regime will increasingly reward disciplined compounders exhibiting durable business models, conservative capital structures, and pricing power. Portfolio turnover during the quarter included additions on twelve occasions and trims on thirteen occasions. The manager initiated new positions in Allegro Microsystems, MACOM Technology Solutions, Sterling Infrastructure, Standex International, SEI Corp., and Cognex Corp., targeting secular beneficiaries in electrification, advanced defense electronics, and data center infrastructure. Conversely, the strategy exited Bio-Techne following its announced acquisition by Merck KGaA, alongside divestments in Workiva, Bright Horizons Family Solutions, and EVI Industries to redeploy capital into higher-conviction franchises.
Conestoga seeks to achieve superior risk-adjusted long-term returns by investing in high-quality small- and mid-cap companies with durable competitive advantages, conservative balance sheets, strong management teams, and high returns on invested capital.
Conestoga anticipates that as corporate earnings growth moderates from cyclical peaks and Treasury yields remain elevated, the market will increasingly reward resilient companies with durable business models, strong management teams, and the capability to grow through higher-cost operating environments.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Conestoga SMid Cap Composite or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.