Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grandeur Peak identifies AI Infrastructure and Obsolescence risks as key portfolio threats, repositioning away from vulnerable software businesses toward AI-neutral companies and diversified infrastructure beneficiaries. Despite quality and growth underperformance headwinds, they maintain process conviction while concentrating portfolios for deeper conviction. Expect earnings growth to surprise upward as conservative guidance proves excessive.
Building portfolios designed to perform across the full spectrum of AI outcomes while maintaining quality and valuation discipline, with lower infrastructure risk than S&P 500 and lower obsolescence risk than private equity.
The manager expects companies to deliver healthy earnings growth and potentially surprise markets on the upside, particularly as conservative guidance from Q1 proves overly cautious. They anticipate European serial acquirer exposure will benefit from improved macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical conflict resolution.
As of Mar 31, 2026
Lead Portfolio Manager
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
High conviction demonstrated through deliberate portfolio concentration (28% reduction in holdings), specific AI risk framework implementation, and maintained process conviction despite headwinds. Clear positioning strategy across four defined zones.
Growth Outlook
Manager acknowledges continued headwinds for their quality and growth approach with significant underperformance gaps, but expresses optimism about remainder of year with companies potentially surprising on upside.
Risk Appetite
Portfolio has been defensively repositioned away from AI obsolescence risks, with methodical trimming and concentration, but maintains selective exposure to AI infrastructure beneficiaries.
Capital Deployment
Net neutral deployment with significant rotation from obsolescence-risk positions to AI-neutral and infrastructure beneficiaries. Concentration through trimming rather than net cash deployment.
Forward Guidance
Manager expects healthy earnings growth and potential upside surprises, anticipating European exposure will benefit from improved conditions, showing mild deployment bias toward current positioning.
Language Signal
Balanced language with risk warnings about AI displacement and quality underperformance offset by confidence in process and optimism about earnings delivery.
Perceived Risk
High risk perception with detailed discussion of AI Infrastructure and Obsolescence risks, systematic risk assessment framework, and warnings about private market exposure limitations.
Opportunity Density
Moderate opportunity density with selective opportunities in AI-neutral companies and diversified infrastructure beneficiaries, but acknowledges difficulty finding quality growth at reasonable valuations.
Time Horizon
Multi-year horizon with focus on sustainable competitive advantages and long-term earnings growth, though some catalyst dependency around macroeconomic improvement and geopolitical resolution.
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Grandeur Peak Global Advisors or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.