Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ironvine Capital Partners reduced semiconductor exposure during Q2 2026 as stock prices increasingly require 2027-2028 AI spending levels to serve as a sustainable baseline, selling portions of Applied Materials, Analog Devices, and Amphenol. The firm initiated a position in Meta Platforms in their Concentrated strategy and added to Core, viewing the company's uniquely powerful data and distribution advantages as creating compelling AI use cases for its advertising platform. They are also accumulating SAP, believing the enterprise software leader is well-positioned to benefit from its cloud migration and AI integration despite market skepticism. The hyperscalers are pouring unprecedented capital into AI infrastructure, with spending potentially requiring $7 trillion in new debt issuance through 2029. This creates a wide range of potential outcomes for the largest companies in the world. If AI progress is slower than anticipated, hyperscalers will be saddled with excess capacity and financial liabilities. The firm believes Microsoft and Meta will emerge from this investment cycle with durable growth intact, though they continue monitoring strategic and capital allocation decisions closely. Cash levels remain at 1-2% as the firm sees attractive valuations across select businesses.
Ironvine is navigating a period of significant uncertainty in AI infrastructure spending by selectively rotating capital from semiconductor holdings where valuations now require sustained elevated spending levels, into companies with more compelling risk-reward profiles including Meta Platforms and SAP, while maintaining conviction that both Microsoft and Meta will successfully navigate the current technological transition despite near-term market skepticism.
The firm is monitoring the AI infrastructure buildout closely, particularly strategic and capital allocation decisions by hyperscalers. They believe Meta and Microsoft will emerge from this season of sowing with durable growth intact. The market is taking an increasingly glass-half-empty view of the likelihood of an attractive outcome for AI infrastructure investments. The firm sees the market valuing some great businesses at highly attractive levels at present and is nearly fully invested with cash running at 1-2% of portfolios.
As of Jul 21, 2026
Founded in 2013 by Matt Barnes, CFA, and Ryan Mendlik, CFA, with David Perkins, CFA joining as a partner in 2019. The leadership team brings extensive experience from prestigious institutions including Cascade Investment LLC (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), Goldman Sachs, and Weitz Investment Management. The firm operates as an independently owned boutique with 6 employees across offices in Omaha, Nebraska and Kirkland, Washington. They manage approximately $1.1 billion across 516 accounts with an average account size of $2.1 million, serving high-net-worth individuals, charitable organizations, and institutional clients.
Quality Value / Growth
Lead Portfolio Manager
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
The manager demonstrates moderate-high conviction through specific position sizing actions: initiating Meta in Concentrated strategy, adding to Meta in Core, accumulating SAP, and selling portions of three semiconductor holdings. They provide detailed thesis work on SAP spanning multiple pages with specific valuation metrics (below 18x earnings) and clear risk scenarios. The letter names specific positions and explains trade-offs, such as selling Boston Omaha to fund other investments. However, the portfolio appears diversified across multiple holdings, and the manager acknowledges significant uncertainty around AI infrastructure outcomes. The combination of specific named positions with detailed analysis, active portfolio management, and willingness to make trade-offs supports a conviction score in the moderate-high range, though not at the extreme concentration level.
Growth Outlook
Market outlook remains low conviction: AI disruption drove extreme market volatility in Q1 2026, creating the widest price dispersion since 2020. Ironvine capitalized on the bifurcation, maintaining conviction in semico...
Risk Appetite
Risk appetite posture is moderate conviction: AI disruption drove extreme market volatility in Q1 2026, creating the widest price dispersion since 2020. Ironvine capitalized on the bifurcation, maintaining conviction in semico...
Capital Deployment
Cash levels remain stable at 1-2% of portfolios, indicating no meaningful change in net exposure. The manager is actively rotating capital by selling portions of semiconductor holdings and using proceeds to initiate or add to Meta and SAP positions. This represents capital rotation rather than net deployment or de-risking. The sale of Boston Omaha to fund other investments further confirms rotation activity. With cash levels unchanged and activity focused on rebalancing rather than increasing or decreasing net exposure, the score reflects neutral positioning with slight positive bias given the active redeployment into new opportunities.
Forward Guidance
Forward guidance signal: AI disruption drove extreme market volatility in Q1 2026, creating the widest price dispersion since 2020. Ironvine capitalized on the bifurcation, maintaining conviction in semico...
Language Signal
The letter contains balanced directional language. Risk-oriented language includes uncertainty around AI outcomes, widening range of potential outcomes, excess capacity concerns, and market punishment of hyperscalers. Opportunity-oriented language includes attractive valuations, compelling use cases for Meta, advantaged position for SAP, and conviction that Meta and Microsoft will emerge successfully. The discussion of selling semiconductor positions due to valuation concerns and the glass-half-empty market view tilts the language slightly negative, though this is balanced by constructive views on specific holdings.
Perceived Risk
Perceived risk level is evaluated as moderate conviction. AI disruption drove extreme market volatility in Q1 2026, creating the widest price dispersion since 2020. Ironvine capitalized on the bifurcation, maintaining conviction in semico...
Opportunity Density
The manager describes seeing attractive valuations in select businesses and states the market is valuing some great businesses at highly attractive levels at present. They are actively accumulating new positions (SAP) and initiating positions (Meta in Concentrated). However, they also note that new investments force them to make tough trade-offs given limited cash on hand and a growing list of good ideas. The language suggests selective opportunities in defined areas rather than a broad, rich opportunity set. The dispersion of price action across the universe of companies they like continued throughout the quarter, creating pockets of opportunity but not universal abundance.
Time Horizon
The manager demonstrates a multi-year investment horizon. They discuss SAP's cloud migration being halfway complete, implying a multi-year thesis. They reference underwriting Applied Materials in spring 2024 and discuss 2027-2028 spending levels as relevant to their semiconductor thesis. The letter emphasizes deeply embedded products that customers spend decades improving rather than replacing, and discusses Meta's ability to leverage its feedback loop to further its lead in time. They note being mindful of capital gains and seeking to minimize drag on returns as money compounds, suggesting long-term orientation. However, they are also actively managing positions based on near-term valuation changes, as evidenced by trimming semiconductor exposure in recent weeks. The combination of multi-year thesis work with active tactical adjustments suggests a 2-4 year time horizon rather than permanent capital or decade-plus holding periods.
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Ironvine Capital Partners or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.