Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 13, 2026
Longleaf Partners Fund reported a difficult third quarter in 2026, delivering a net return of -2.41% and bringing year-to-date performance to -3.15% net of fees, lagging the broad equity rally reflected in the S&P 500 (+2.30% in Q3; +12.75% YTD) and Russell 1000 Value (+2.61% in Q3; +19.27% YTD). Management maintains that fundamental corporate appraisal values have materially outpaced the share price scoreboard, creating a wide divergence between quoted market multiples and underlying cash-generative power across the fund's 18 holdings. Portfolio exposure remains disciplined, finishing the quarter with a price-to-value ratio in the mid-50s percentage range and an unencumbered cash reserve of 6.4% of total net assets. The manager's macroeconomic diagnosis points to an irrational and punitive environment that severely penalizes non-AI equities and penalizes companies experiencing short-term, fixable earnings disruptions. Higher interest rates are identified as a recent macro wildcard that disproportionately impacts market sentiment in rate-sensitive segments like housing and timber, though the fund's balance-sheet-strong holdings remain resilient. Two dominant portfolio themes explain current positioning: deeply oversold holdings facing transitory operational resets that the market has erroneously extrapolated into perpetuity, and high-quality, owner-operated compounders whose positive underlying earnings growth has not yet been reflected in stock prices. Portfolio activity remained focused and catalytic, highlighted by initiating a new position in Universal Music Group, adding to Fortune Brands Innovations following short-term earnings guidance cuts, and trimming Avantor into price strength after a 50% quarterly rebound. Top conviction holdings—including People Inc. (8.5%), Albertsons (7.7%), and Exor (7.6%)—are experiencing constructive corporate actions and strategic optionality, while late-quarter M&A interest and leadership transitions at Mattel (6.4%) exemplify management's active investee engagement to unlock value.
Capitalize on irrational market bifurcations by taking concentrated, contrarian positions in deeply discounted, cash-generative companies where active corporate engagement and corporate restructuring catalyze value recognition.
Management expresses elevated confidence in future prospective returns as portfolio price-to-value discounts have improved into the mid-50s percentage range. With corporate earnings multiples compressed by 10-20% despite operational derisking, the fund anticipates that the defensive, cash-generative nature of its underlying businesses and ongoing corporate engagement catalysts will deliver powerful downside protection and superior long-term performance relative to an elevated broad market.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Longleaf Partners Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.