Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 13, 2026
Longleaf Partners Global Fund declined -6.21% net of fees in the third quarter of 2026, bringing year-to-date net returns to -5.07%, trailing the MSCI World Index's 1.88% quarterly and 11.75% YTD gains, as well as the MSCI World Value Index's 3.84% quarterly and 14.74% YTD advances. The fund maintained a concentrated portfolio of 21 holdings with a price-to-value ratio in the low-50s percentage range and a cash allocation of 4.0%. Portfolio drag was concentrated in companies suffering from short-term earnings resets that the market extrapolated indefinitely, creating an extreme disconnect between underlying value progression and share prices. The macroeconomic environment was characterized by heightened volatility, irrational market sentiment, and rising interest rates serving as an emerging wildcard. The manager observed an environment that excessively punished companies reporting short-term operational headwinds or those disconnected from prevailing macroeconomic themes, while broader market benchmarks remained elevated due to narrow leadership. The strategy remains anchored in identifying companies whose long-term earnings power and balance sheets can withstand elevated interest rate regimes, with fundamental appraisal values proving significantly more resilient than quoted stock prices. Portfolio activity featured the initiation of two new positions, including Universal Music Group and an undisclosed Asian industry leader with a net cash balance sheet and aggressive share repurchase program. Capital was deployed into existing holdings exhibiting market-driven weakness, such as Canal+ and Fortune Brands Innovations, while the remaining stake in Glanbia was completely exited after exceeding appraisal value following multiple guidance upgrades. Active shareholder engagement remained a central driver, with potential M&A and corporate restructuring catalysts developing across core holdings including Mattel, IDP Education, and People Inc.
Invest with concentrated conviction in financially strong, deeply undervalued businesses led by aligned owner-operators trading at steep discounts to intrinsic value where corporate catalysts and operational execution will unlock long-term compounding.
The manager expresses high confidence in prospective returns based on a portfolio price-to-value ratio anchored in the low-50s percentage range, which has become materially more attractive throughout 2026. The defensive balance sheet strength, lower valuation multiples, and tangible downside protection across core holdings are anticipated to insulate capital against an elevated MSCI World Index. Furthermore, the fund expects active shareholder engagement and announced strategic corporate catalysts—such as pending M&A transactions and corporate restructurings—to accelerate value realization.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Longleaf Partners Global Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.