Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 12, 2026
During the third quarter of 2026, the Madison Dividend Income Fund (Class I) advanced +0.5% net of fees, underperforming the S&P 500 Index (+2.3%) and the Russell 1000 Value Index (+2.6%), while marginally outpacing the Lipper Equity Income peer group (+0.1%). On a year-to-date basis, the fund delivered an +8.2% net return compared to +12.7% for the S&P 500 and +19.2% for the Russell 1000 Value. The strategy maintains an active share of 88.55% versus the S&P 500, a high-quality portfolio profile with 92% of holdings rated A- or better by S&P, and a cash allocation of 1.86% of net assets. The investment team highlights severe valuation and concentration risks within the broader equity market, where the S&P 500 trades at an all-time record 1-year forward price-to-sales multiple of 3.5x. Heavy index concentration in non-dividend paying mega-cap Technology and Communication Services names driven by artificial intelligence capital expenditures contrasts sharply with deeply discounted cyclical and income sectors. The manager emphasizes a constructive macro and fundamental case for the Energy sector, citing multi-decade lows in index weighting (4% combined with Materials) alongside robust capital discipline, modest balance sheet leverage, and attractive capital returns. Portfolio activity and positioning remain anchored in defensive, high-quality companies with durable moats and dividend yields well above the broader market. Top equity holdings include Johnson & Johnson (5.65%), Exxon Mobil (5.21%), and Chevron (5.07%), alongside diversified leaders such as AbbVie (3.77%) and Procter & Gamble (3.67%). The managers project that valuation mean-reversion toward historical multiples of 2.0x price-to-sales and sector re-weighting toward Energy will provide substantial downside protection and long-term relative outperformance.
Investing in high-quality, wide-moat companies with above-average dividend yields and disciplined capital allocation generates compelling long-term returns while providing defensive downside protection across market cycles.
The investment team anticipates that extreme index concentration and record price-to-sales valuations of 3.5x pose substantial risks of multiple contraction and market correction. They expect market conditions to normalize over the coming years, enabling Energy and Materials to expand back toward their long-term 10-12% combined index weighting from today's depressed 4% level. Consequently, portfolios tilted toward disciplined, cash-generative dividend growth with A- or better balance sheet ratings are positioned to deliver superior downside protection and competitive risk-adjusted returns across a full market cycle.
Neutral / Balanced
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Madison Dividend Income Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.