Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Aug 10, 2026
RVK's Q2 2026 peer group analysis presents performance statistics for institutional investment portfolios across four major categories: Public Defined Benefit Plans, Taft Hartley Defined Benefit Plans, Endowments and Foundations, and Master Trust accounts. The second quarter saw equity markets rally, supported by easing geopolitical tensions and continued strength in AI-related spending. Fixed income markets posted positive returns despite initial Treasury yield volatility from shifting inflation expectations. Consistent with global market returns, institutional investment portfolios finished the quarter with positive absolute performance. The analysis provides percentile rankings from the 5th to 95th percentiles across multiple time horizons, including quarter-to-date, year-to-date, and periods ranging from one year to ten years. Median quarterly returns ranged from 7.26 percent for Taft Hartley plans to 8.99 percent for Public DB Plans. The document emphasizes that peer comparisons should be considered in appropriate context given the wide range of circumstances within each peer group, and should serve as one data point among several in evaluating performance results.
This document provides peer group performance analysis for institutional investment portfolios across multiple categories (Public DB Plans, Taft Hartley DB Plans, Endowments & Foundations, and Master Trust) for Q2 2026, showing that portfolios finished the quarter with positive absolute performance supported by equity market rallies driven by easing geopolitical tensions and AI-related spending strength.
High Conviction Bearish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with RVK or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.