Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 20, 2026
The Sands Capital Global Growth strategy declined 1.9% net of fees in the third quarter of 2026, lagging the MSCI ACWI benchmark return of 1.6%. Year-to-date, the portfolio has advanced 2.0% net of fees compared to 13.0% for the index. Relative underperformance during the quarter was primarily driven by the broader pullback across the artificial intelligence infrastructure supply chain and the strategy's underweight exposure to value-oriented sectors including energy, materials, and industrials, as well as the deliberate avoidance of certain mega-cap technology companies. The portfolio held a 1.8% cash position at quarter-end, with North America (55.2%) and Western Europe (19.1%) representing the primary geographic allocations. Macroeconomic volatility was pronounced during the quarter, sparked by a sharp July drawdown across global semiconductor equities, surging government bond yields, rising energy prices, and heightened investor scrutiny over artificial intelligence capital expenditure returns. Value-oriented equities outperformed growth by more than 400 basis points. Sands Capital views market movements as increasingly driven by mechanical index rebalancing and short-term passive factor rotations, which detach valuations from underlying fundamental business quality. Portfolio turnover remained disciplined at 24% over the trailing 12 months across 38 holdings. The strategy initiated new positions in Palantir Technologies and Woodward, funding these additions by trimming businesses where multiple expansion compressed the forward risk/reward profile. Top portfolio weights remain concentrated in long-term structural compounders, led by NVIDIA (9.4%), Taiwan Semiconductor (6.5%), Alphabet (5.7%), SK hynix (5.5%), and ASML Holding (5.1%).
Sands Capital Global Growth seeks long-term capital compounding through a concentrated, conviction-weighted global portfolio of high-quality growth businesses that possess sustainable competitive advantages, market leadership, and financial strength.
The manager believes the current market detachment between prices and business values favors active discretion, as their portfolio businesses trade near historically low relative valuations of 19 times forward earnings against 35 percent expected five-year annual earnings growth.
High Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Sands Capital Global Growth Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.