Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Jul 31, 2026
Sands Capital Technology Innovators delivered a 26.9 percent net return in Q2 2026, underperforming its benchmark by 4.2 percentage points as leadership broadened across the semiconductor sector beyond the fund's concentrated mega-cap AI chip positions. The fund's core thesis centers on the AI infrastructure buildout, with the emergence of agentic AI creating another demand shock for compute, memory, storage, and power. The portfolio is positioned across key bottlenecks including Taiwan Semiconductor, SK hynix, NVIDIA, and Seagate Technology, which were top contributors. The manager added positions in AMD, Arm, Intel, Cerebras, SanDisk, SpaceX, and TTM Technologies to broaden exposure across CPUs, inference, memory, and circuit boards. Consumer internet exposure was reduced through exits of DoorDash, Netflix, Coupang, and Roblox to redeploy capital toward higher-conviction AI infrastructure opportunities. The manager expects persistent constraints in compute capacity to sustain the infrastructure buildout, though monitors risks including open-source model competition, token optimization, and architectural breakthroughs. Recent strength has been tied to earnings growth, improving pricing, and supply-demand constraints in critical areas of the AI stack.
The fund is positioned to capitalize on the AI infrastructure buildout by concentrating investments in businesses operating at key bottlenecks across the AI value chain, including semiconductor manufacturing, memory, CPUs, AI chips, and enabling infrastructure, where demand is growing rapidly and supply cannot respond quickly.
The manager expects the proliferation of agentic AI workflows to drive persistent constraints in compute capacity, sustaining the infrastructure buildout. The portfolio is positioned across several bottlenecks believed to be essential to scaling AI, including memory, CPUs, AI chips, semiconductor manufacturing, capital equipment, and power. The manager is focused on areas where demand is growing rapidly, supply cannot respond quickly, and industry structures appear more attractive than in prior cycles. While monitoring risks that could alter the trajectory of spending, the current view is that rising AI usage and broader deployment of agents should continue to place pressure on infrastructure required to support AI at scale. The manager expects periods of digestion given strong returns, concentrated leadership, and elevated momentum exposure, but remains encouraged that recent strength has been tied to earnings growth, improving pricing, and supply-demand constraints in critical areas of the AI infrastructure stack.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Sands Capital Technology Innovators Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.