Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 14, 2026
For the third quarter of 2026, the Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) produced a return of 1.53%, underperforming both the S&P 500 Index (2.30%) and the Russell 1000 Value Index (2.61%). Performance was driven positively by Cenovus Energy, APA Corp, and Merck & Co., as geopolitical tensions highlighted the value of long-life energy assets and Merck advanced late-stage lung cancer therapies to address Keytruda's upcoming 2028 patent expiration. Conversely, mall REITs Macerich and Simon Property Group, along with homebuilder D.R. Horton, were the quarter's primary detractors due to interest rate headwinds, though management reiterates that current rates reflect historical norms and emphasize the strong replacement-cost protections and foot-traffic demand supporting mall properties. In their commentary titled 'Breaking the Fever,' portfolio managers Bill Smead and Cole Smead compare current market conditions—characterized by massive AI-driven capital expenditures, high fiscal deficits, and extreme market concentration—to prior euphoric peaks where market 'Generals' marched while the underlying breadth deteriorated. Reaffirming their concentrated, valuation-disciplined strategy, the managers refuse to chase high-multiple growth equities, positioning instead in companies with robust current free cash flows and tangible asset backing that are poised to outperform when speculative fever cools.
The fund operates on the principle that interest rates have returned to long-run historical norms, requiring investors to discount long-term net profits at higher rates and prioritize immediate owner earnings over distant promises of growth ('a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush'). The managers argue that the current market environment is characterized by an unsustainable, euphoric capital investment boom around AI infrastructure and data centers, driving index concentration to dangerous peak levels (~40%) with deteriorating market breadth. Consequently, the fund is positioned defensively in high-free-cash-flow, low-valuation companies—particularly in energy, pharmaceuticals, and irreplaceable real estate assets—while completely bypassing speculative, long-duration growth sectors.
Management anticipates that the euphoric AI-led market cycle will inevitably break as market breadth remains unhealthy (with 70% of S&P 500 stocks declining in September despite index gains) and government deficits persist. When the speculative fever breaks, the fund expects mortgage rates to normalize lower, benefiting interest-rate-sensitive holdings such as homebuilders, while broader value investing will strongly outperform growth—a trend historically correlated with oil outperforming gold. The fund explicitly prioritizes capital preservation (invoking Warren Buffett's rule number one: 'never lose money') over participating in the tail end of the current market mania.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Smead Value Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.