Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 20, 2026
The London Company Income Equity portfolio posted a net return of -3.6% (-3.4% gross) in the third quarter of 2026, trailing the Russell 1000 Value Index gain of 2.6%. Year-to-date, the strategy delivered a net return of 12.6% compared to 19.3% for the benchmark. Relative performance was pressured by stock selection and sector allocation, notably an overweight stance in lagging Industrials and an underweight position in outperforming Health Care. The strategy was also impacted by benchmark reconstitution dynamics, having missed a cyclical rally in memory and semiconductor capital equipment prior to their removal from the index, while facing renewed strength from newly introduced mega-cap technology constituents in the value benchmark. From a macroeconomic perspective, manager commentary highlighted a bifurcated market regime marked by resurgent inflation pressures and tightening monetary policy. The Federal Reserve initiated a 25 basis point rate hike during September, its first increase since 2023, propelling 10-year Treasury yields to levels not seen since 2002. Elevated borrowing costs and higher crude prices stemming from escalating Middle East tensions compressed equity valuations. The investment team noted that headline market strength remains exceptionally narrow, driven by massive artificial intelligence infrastructure spending that echoes historical buildout cycles prone to interim drawdowns. Portfolio activity reflected disciplined re-underwriting toward high-quality, cash-generative franchises. The strategy initiated a new position in Alphabet Inc. through mandatory convertible preferred shares (GOOGM/GOOGN) yielding approximately 6.25%, capitalizing on the company's full-stack AI infrastructure buildout. Cisco Systems (CSCO) was trimmed following share price strength to balance position sizing. Conversely, the portfolio completely exited Crown Castle (CCI) due to muted carrier capital expenditures and competitive headwinds, reallocating capital toward higher-conviction compounders with conservative balance sheets and durable payout profiles.
The strategy invests in high-quality, dividend-paying equities with conservative leverage and superior returns on invested capital to deliver durable income, capital preservation, and attractive risk-adjusted returns across full market cycles.
The economic backdrop remains supported by solid growth and improving business activity, but mounting headwinds from Fed tightening, elevated Treasury yields, and energy prices warrant portfolio discipline. Management anticipates that high-quality attributes—strong returns on capital, conservative balance sheets, and durable dividends—will provide essential downside protection and relative outperformance as fundamental realities reassert themselves.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with The London Company Income Equity or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.