Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 20, 2026
The London Company Large Cap portfolio declined 3.4% net of fees (-3.2% gross) in the third quarter of 2026, lagging the Russell 1000 Index gain of 1.8%. Year-to-date, the portfolio generated a 9.5% net return compared to 12.3% for the benchmark. Relative underperformance during the quarter was driven by both stock selection and sector positioning, most notably an underweight exposure to mega-cap information technology leaders alongside an overweight allocation to lagging industrials. Upside capture fell short of the strategy's traditional 85% to 90% target as market participation narrowed sharply. Macroeconomic crosscurrents defined the quarter as the Federal Reserve initiated a 25 basis point interest rate increase, driving 10-year Treasury yields to their highest levels since 2002. Concurrently, escalating geopolitical conflict in the Middle East drove crude oil prices higher and reignited inflationary concerns. While economic output and manufacturing activity proved resilient, rising borrowing costs and energy prices compressed market multiples and pressured consumer confidence, with initial credit stress surfacing among lower-income cohorts. Equity index performance was disproportionately propelled by an increasingly concentrated cohort of AI-linked mega-cap equities. Portfolio activity remained selective and disciplined. The strategy incrementally increased its position in NewMarket Corporation following its capacity expansion in defense-oriented specialty materials. Leading quarterly contributors included NewMarket Corporation, Chevron, and BlackRock, which benefited from strong downstream margins and robust ETF inflows. Performance was weighed down by pullbacks in Entegris, Old Dominion Freight Line, and Martin Marietta Materials, though long-term conviction in these franchises remains anchored in their pricing power, operating leverage, and disciplined balance sheets.
We seek profitable, financially stable, quality large-cap companies that generate consistent free cash flow, sustain high returns on unleveraged operating capital, trade at rational valuations, and are steered by shareholder-oriented management teams.
While crosscurrents from tightening monetary policy and elevated energy costs argue for discipline, portfolios focused on strong returns on capital, conservative balance sheets, and rational valuations are positioned to participate as fundamentals reassert themselves.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with The London Company Large Cap or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.