Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 22, 2026
The Antipodes Global Value strategy outperformed its benchmark over the third quarter of 2026 and finished in-line over the trailing twelve months, while underperforming the MSCI ACWI Value Index. Specific fund net return figures were not explicitly published in the commentary. Stock selection within information technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services served as the primary drivers of relative performance, while allocations to financials and healthcare detracted. From a regional perspective, North American exposures contributed positively, bolstered by an underweight stance in Korea, whereas European and Emerging Markets positions detracted. Overall portfolio exposure was rotated by increasing net technology weightings while trimming capital across utilities, materials, consumer staples, and financials. Macroeconomic conditions during the quarter were characterized by heightened volatility, an accelerating artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, and a synchronized shift toward monetary tightening. Surging Middle East tensions and disruption in the Strait of Hormuz drove Brent Crude past $100 per barrel, reigniting inflation fears and prompting a global bond sell-off where the US 10-year Treasury yield rose to 5.3%. In response to persistent price pressures, the Federal Reserve delivered a 25 basis point rate hike, accompanied by rate increases from the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan. Against this backdrop, Antipodes positioned the strategy around four key themes: energy and power infrastructure, AI disruption opportunities, quality compounders at trough multiples, and AI-agnostic industries benefiting from demographic aging. Portfolio activity reflected disciplined rebalancing and capital redeployment toward mispriced compounders. The fund initiated new long positions in Samsung Electronics on High Bandwidth Memory (HBM4) market share opportunities, Biogen on commercial pipeline inflection, and Skyworks on analog consolidation synergies. The team also augmented its stake in Alibaba, citing accelerating cloud revenue growth and trough multiples. These additions were funded by taking profits and fully exiting RWE, Kokusai Electric, and Owens Corning following strong price appreciation that narrowed their respective margins of safety.
Antipodes applies an all-weather global value approach seeking resilient compounders, AI-related infrastructure beneficiaries, and quality franchises trading at trough multiples before market breadth widens away from mega-cap tech.
The strategy anticipates market breadth to widen away from unprecedented mega-cap concentration, favoring resilient compounders, energy and grid infrastructure, and quality franchises at trough multiples.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Antipodes Global Value Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.