Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antipodes' core investment philosophy focuses on exploiting market inefficiencies by seeking resilient businesses with durable competitive advantages trading at reasonable valuations, particularly as extreme market concentration in AI hardware creates mispricings elsewhere. During the second quarter of 2026, the strategy experienced relative underperformance due to its underweight position in highly concentrated AI hardware and memory companies, which saw explosive, momentum-driven gains. In contrast, the manager remains cautious of deeply cyclical memory businesses, instead shifting capital into analog, power, and RF semiconductor names that boast longer lifecycles and stable pricing power. The portfolio is structurally aligned with multi-year secular trends, including western infrastructure underinvestment, grid electrification, and underappreciated incumbent SaaS players that have been unfairly discounted by AI disruption fears. Key risks include sticky US inflation, hawkish central bank policies, and commodity market fluctuations. Ultimately, the portfolio is defensively yet constructively positioned for an eventual widening of market breadth, which its value-biased, all-weather framework is designed to exploit.
Exploiting global market inefficiencies by investing in resilient, cash-generative businesses with durable moats at attractive valuations, particularly where structural tailwinds are mispriced relative to cyclical risks.
The manager remains positioned for market breadth to widen against a backdrop of unprecedented market concentration. By maintaining an 'all-weather' value approach, the fund is geared to benefit from a rotation away from overvalued cyclical hardware and into areas with reasonable valuations and structural tailwinds, including specialty semiconductors, software incumbents, and infrastructure capex.
As of Jul 25, 2026
Jacob Mitchell founded Antipodes Partners in 2015 and serves as Chief Investment Officer and Lead Portfolio Manager for Global strategies. Prior to founding Antipodes, Mitchell spent 14 years at Platinum Asset Management where he was deputy chief investment officer and portfolio manager of the flagship Platinum International fund. He has over 20 years of investment management experience and holds a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Western Sydney. Under his leadership, Antipodes has grown from a dedicated global value equity manager into a multi-specialist investment firm managing over A$21 billion across teams in Sydney, London, and Melbourne.
Antipodes employs a 'pragmatic value' investment approach that seeks to identify mispriced companies relative to their business resilience and growth profile. The firm focuses on taking advantage of market irrationality, identifying investments that offer a high margin of safety, and building high conviction portfolios with a capital preservation focus. Unconstrained by geographical boundaries, the strategy searches globally for attractive investment opportunities across developed and emerging markets.
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Antipodes Global Value Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.