Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 15, 2026
During the third quarter of 2026, the Capicraft Global Creator strategy returned 5.34% net of fees in dollar terms, bringing year-to-date net performance to 6.48%. This outpaced the comparable global multi-asset high-equity category, which returned 0.23% net for the quarter and 4.92% net year-to-date, though it continued to trail the All Country World Equity benchmark's 13.36% year-to-date return. The Capicraft multi-asset portfolio gained 4.75% net in rand terms for the quarter and 5.35% net year-to-date. In response to extreme equity market concentration and rising capital costs, the manager maintained an overweight stance in real assets while introducing a small position in long-dated nominal government bonds yielding over 5%. The manager's macro framework centers on physical bottlenecks constraining the digital artificial intelligence build-out, escalating geopolitical supply chain disruptions, and persistent inflationary pressures. The massive capital expenditure commitments of technology hyperscalers are colliding with physical limitations in power generation, transformers, and copper supplies, creating systemic capital cycle risks if future revenues fail to materialize. Simultaneously, military strikes and shipping route closures across the Middle East and the Black Sea have severely constrained refined product exports, keeping diesel prices elevated and embedding cost inflation across agricultural and industrial transportation networks. Portfolio activity was characterized by maintaining exposure to real assets with structural advantages, including global agricultural agribusiness Bunge, alongside physical grain and maize contracts and sugar producers. To hedge against the possibility of a sharp slowdown in AI infrastructure spending and broad credit contraction, the manager initiated a tactical allocation to long-dated nominal US government bonds to provide portfolio diversification and yield if economic growth and inflation decelerate.
Digital economic expansion and artificial intelligence infrastructure remain strictly constrained by the physical realities of energy, commodities, and credit cycles, requiring robust portfolio positioning in resilient real assets and defensive nominal yield.
The manager anticipates that the physical economy will continue to dictate the ultimate pace and profitability of the digital build-out. Persistently high debt, geopolitical fragmentation, and energy security costs will prevent a return to the disinflationary regime of the 2010s, though intermediate growth slowdowns could prompt sustained rallies in high-yielding nominal bonds.
Neutral / Balanced
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Capicraft Investment Partners or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.