Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 14, 2026
EMA GARP Fund, LP posted a net return of 21.41% for the third quarter of 2026, narrowing its year-to-date net decline to -5.25%. The strategy outpaced major equity and precious metal indices during the quarter, aided by an operational and market rebound across mining equities, where underlying equities rallied three to five times more than physical bullion. The portfolio maintains an aggressive, equity-heavy stance weighted 65% in gold miners, 25% in silver miners, and 10% in Bitcoin and related investments, with a distinct tilt toward high-quality development-stage mining assets. The manager's macroeconomic framework centers on an intensifying sovereign debt crisis, characterized by unsustainable federal budget deficits near 7% of GDP and spiking global long-term sovereign bond yields. EMA contends that ballooning interest expense and refinancing pressures will inevitably force the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury into financial repression through Yield Curve Control and renewed quantitative easing. With fiat currencies facing systemic structural debasement and de-dollarization accelerating, the fund views scarce hard assets—specifically physical precious metals, miners, and decentralized digital commodities—as the principal beneficiaries of upcoming monetary expansion. Portfolio allocation remains concentrated within mining equities, where free cash flow generation has reached multi-year highs while valuations linger well below historical multiples relative to bullion prices. Allocations are structured across mine developers (46%), producers (35%), exploration drill plays (9%), and Bitcoin holdings (10%). Rather than harvesting gains, the managers have strategically increased exposure to development-stage miners to capitalize on lower cost of capital, project de-risking, and outsized operating leverage.
Sovereign debt burdens and escalating fiscal deficits will force central banks into aggressive monetary debasement and yield curve control, driving an enduring multi-year re-rating of monetary metals, miners, and Bitcoin.
EMA anticipates that unmanageable U.S. debt servicing costs will inevitably force government authorities to engage in large-scale monetary expansion within the next 12 to 18 months. This liquidity environment is projected to trigger substantial multiple expansion and cash flow re-ratings across undervalued gold and silver miners, while Bitcoin enters the parabolic phase of its four-year adoption cycle.
High Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Equity Management Associates or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.