The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Qblue Global Equities Responsible Transition Fund aims to achieve long-term capital growth by investing globally in companies that contribute positively to social and environmental sustainability dimensions. During the first quarter of 2026, the fund declined by 3.24% net of fees, outperforming its benchmark, the MSCI World NTR (USD), which dropped by 4.17%. This relative outperformance was primarily driven by strong stock selection, particularly in mega-cap companies where the fund held a defensive 24% underweight position. Geographically, North America and Europe were positive contributors, while Asia Pacific detracted. From a sector perspective, overweights in Information Technology and underweights in Energy detracted slightly as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East led to a 44% spike in Brent crude prices. This commodity surge renewed global inflation concerns and pushed rate-cut expectations further out, causing market sentiment to deteriorate significantly in March. Within the fund's ESG framework, the UN SDG and ESG Industry Leaders dimensions rebounded, but were offset by a drag in the Climate Transition dimension. Individual holdings such as Applied Materials and Verizon Communications delivered strong returns, while MongoDB, Booking Holdings, and Adobe underperformed and were subsequently liquidated.
Achieving long-term capital growth by investing globally in companies that contribute positively to social and environmental sustainability factors.
The narrative has shifted towards persistent inflation concerns and a repricing of interest rate expectations due to rising energy costs and geopolitical disruptions.
As of Mar 31, 2026
Bjarne Graven Larsen founded Qblue Balanced A/S in 2018, bringing over 30 years of experience in institutional asset management. He previously served as Chief Investment Officer and executive board member at ATP (1999-2011), Denmark's largest pension fund and a global sustainability pioneer, and at Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, one of the world's most sophisticated pension plans. His additional experience includes CEO of FIH Erhvervsbank A/S and positions at Realkredit Denmark, Denmark's Central Bank, and the Ministry of Finance. He also chaired the Investment Committee at CIP, Europe's leading renewable infrastructure fund. The current management team includes experienced professionals from ATP with expertise in systematic investment strategies and quantitative processes.
Lead Portfolio Manager
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Assigned 0.60 reflecting moderate conviction. The fund's top 10 holdings represent 28.0% of the portfolio, indicating a moderately diversified structure. Clear rationales are provided for individual stock trades, but the dominant themes are driven by systemic ESG models rather than highly concentrated singular bets.
Growth Outlook
Assigned 0.25 due to a cautious outlook on global equity markets. The letter highlights deteriorated sentiment, delayed rate cuts, rising geopolitical conflicts in the Middle East, and renewed inflation concerns driving a 6.37% decline in the MSCI World NTR in March.
Risk Appetite
Assigned 0.50 as the fund maintains a balanced posture, holding a diverse portfolio across sectors. While they trimmed software names facing valuation and AI disruption risks, they reinvested in semiconductors and telecom without signaling a major shift in risk posture.
Capital Deployment
Assigned 0.50 as net capital deployment appears stable. The fund's cash and equivalents position remains very low at 0.25%, and while they executed several portfolio adjustments (exiting names like Adobe and Booking Holdings while adding Analog Devices and NXP Semiconductors), overall capital remains fully deployed.
Forward Guidance
Assigned 0.50 as the letter focuses heavily on retrospective Q1 2026 performance and attribution. There is little direct forward-looking operational guidance on specific macro trades or deployment plans.
Language Signal
Assigned 0.35 because the text contains an elevated volume of risk-related terms, discussing geopolitical escalation, delayed monetary easing, inflation worries, and software valuation pressures.
Perceived Risk
Assigned 0.75 because the manager dedicates significant narrative to macro threats, specifically analyzing Middle East geopolitics, the 44% Brent crude spike, and the broader software sector valuation risk due to potential AI disruption.
Opportunity Density
Assigned 0.50 representing a neutral opportunity density. While the manager finds attractive setups in semiconductor and telecom re-ratings (Applied Materials and Verizon), they also note extensive software sector challenges and struggle with the Climate Transition dimension's performance.
Time Horizon
Assigned 0.75 based on the explicit long-term capital growth objective and multi-year evaluation of sustainability dimensions. Despite short-term quarterly volatility, the investment framework focuses on multi-year transition cycles.
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Heptagon Capital or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.
