Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIT Capital Partners delivered a resilient performance in March 2026, declining only 1.9% while participating in just 33% of the ACWI downside during a broad risk-off move triggered by escalating Middle East geopolitical tensions. The diversified global portfolio generated positive returns for Q1 2026 while the ACWI declined. Private investments drove performance with positive returns following additional fund valuations and strong distributions, enabling new commitments to specialist partners. Key holdings Anthropic, Databricks, and SpaceX showed positive developments with financing rounds and potential IPO plans at valuations above current holdings. Quoted equities declined as commodity-related equities and emerging markets reversed earlier outperformance, though timely profit-taking in gold miners and emerging markets reduced downside impact. The fund reduced exposure ahead of Middle East tensions and established oil positions, positioning to deploy capital on further weakness. Uncorrelated strategies fell modestly with negative gold contributions offset by oil positions. Share buybacks of £12.6m in March brought YTD repurchases to £28.1m, adding estimated 0.25% NAV accretion.
RIT delivers compelling growth through market cycles via a diversified global portfolio across quoted equities, private investments, and uncorrelated strategies, with superior long-term performance and less risk than equity markets.
The outlook for private investments remains constructive, supported by positive developments across key holdings. The fund is positioned to deploy capital on further weakness in quoted equity markets given reduced exposure.
As of Mar 31, 2026
The strategy is led by Chief Investment Officer Daniel G. Bandi and includes senior portfolio managers Daniel J. DeMonica, CFA, Mirsat Nikovic, CFA, and Sean A. Burke, along with Brian T. Cavalier as Head of Equity Trading. The Rocky River, Ohio-based team has been working together since 1999, providing significant experience and continuity in their investment approach. Daniel Bandi serves as Chief Investment Officer for Integrity Asset Management's value equity strategies and is the lead portfolio manager for multiple small-cap and micro-cap value strategies within the franchise.
The Integrity Micro Cap Value Equity strategy invests in a diversified portfolio of micro capitalization stocks that are currently undervalued but poised to outperform. Integrity believes that superior risk-adjusted performance is achieved by maintaining a diversified portfolio of micro capitalization stocks trading below intrinsic value with improving investor sentiment. The strategy seeks to invest in the right company, at the right price, and at the right time through rigorous fundamental analysis.
Lead Portfolio Manager
Neutral / Balanced
Market Conviction
High-conviction positioning: RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Growth Outlook
Market outlook remains high conviction: RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Risk Appetite
Risk appetite posture is high conviction: RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Capital Deployment
Manager actively deployed capital into high-conviction opportunities. RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Forward Guidance
Forward guidance signal: RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Language Signal
Tone analysis indicates very low conviction language: RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Perceived Risk
Perceived risk level is evaluated as moderate conviction. RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Opportunity Density
Opportunity density index indicates moderate conviction actionable entry points. RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Time Horizon
Investment time horizon reflects a moderate conviction orientation. RIT delivered resilient March performance, declining 1.9% while capturing only 33% of ACWI downside during Middle East geopolitical tensions. Private investments drove positive ret...
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Integrity Asset Management or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.