The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kennedy Capital's Mid Cap Value composite returned 15.6% net in Q2 2026, outperforming the Russell Midcap Value Index by 217 basis points despite a 350 basis point headwind from three unowned index constituents. The index returned 13.4%, driven by AI-linked stocks in Information Technology which rose 58.7% and contributed over 52% of index returns despite representing only 15% of the benchmark. The manager avoided Sandisk, Western Digital, and Corning based on historical cyclicality and lower returns on capital, viewing their pricing power from memory and storage shortages as temporary. Outperformance came from stock selection in Industrials, Materials, and Consumer sectors. In late June and early July, the manager reduced exposure to AI winners where valuations limit further upside and redeployed proceeds into stocks experiencing excessive pessimism. While AI spending is expected to increase in 2027, the portfolio maintains its discipline of investing in companies with above-average returns on capital and sustainable reinvestment opportunities.
Kennedy Capital pursues mid cap value investing by focusing on companies with demonstrated ability to generate above-average returns on invested capital and opportunities to reinvest cash flows at rates exceeding their cost of capital, while avoiding cyclical businesses with lower return profiles even when they experience temporary pricing power.
The manager expects AI spending to increase again in 2027, though valuations in certain AI-linked stocks have reached levels limiting further upside. The portfolio is positioned with reduced exposure to AI winners and increased allocation to stocks experiencing excessive market pessimism, reflecting a value-oriented approach focused on companies with strong returns on capital.
As of Jul 29, 2026
Christian McDonald, CFA®, was appointed as portfolio manager effective September 1, 2025, following the retirement of Gary Kauppila, CFA®, on October 1, 2025. The strategy has been managed by experienced professionals within Kennedy Capital Management's collaborative team environment. The firm was founded in 1980 and employs 46 full-time professionals specializing in various market capitalizations and investment styles. Kennedy Capital Management was recognized as a 2025 Best Places to Work in Money Management by Pensions & Investments, reflecting its commitment to fostering a collaborative culture where team members have stake in success through continuous learning opportunities and comprehensive benefits.
Kennedy Capital Management believes that companies with superior returns on invested capital with the ability to reinvest those cash flows produce a powerful, value-creating compounding effect. The portfolio manager focuses on companies with demonstrated ability to generate above-average returns on invested capital and seeks undervalued companies with opportunities to reinvest cash flows at rates exceeding their cost of capital. The firm employs a labor-intensive, bottom-up fundamental research process providing coverage of all major industry sectors, with analysts supporting all strategies independently to give portfolio managers broader perspective.
Lead Portfolio Manager
Moderate Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
The manager demonstrates moderate-high conviction through clear articulation of investment criteria (above-average returns on capital, sustainable reinvestment opportunities) and disciplined avoidance of businesses that don't meet these standards despite strong performance. The letter names three specific stocks avoided (Sandisk, Western Digital, Corning) and explains the rationale in detail. However, no individual portfolio holdings are named or sized, and the letter does not disclose position count or concentration levels. The active rotation from AI winners into value opportunities shows conviction in the process, but the absence of specific portfolio positioning details caps the score below 0.75. The explanation references discipline and clear criteria, supporting a score in the moderate-high range.
Growth Outlook
The manager acknowledges strong absolute market performance in Q2 2026 driven by AI optimism and Middle East peace resolution, with the Russell Midcap Value Index up 13.4%. However, the tone is measured rather than enthusiastic, noting that AI valuations have reached limiting levels in certain cases. The manager expects AI spending to increase in 2027 but frames this as a sector-specific catalyst rather than broad market optimism. The balanced view of strong recent performance tempered by valuation concerns and selective opportunity warrants a mildly positive score.
Risk Appetite
The portfolio maintained less than 3% cash throughout the quarter, indicating full investment, but the manager actively reduced exposure to AI winners in late June/July as valuations became limiting. This reflects selective risk-taking rather than aggressive deployment. The rotation from AI winners into pessimistic stocks shows willingness to take contrarian positions but within a disciplined framework focused on returns on capital. The combination of full investment with active trimming of extended positions suggests mildly positive risk appetite.
Capital Deployment
The manager reduced exposure to AI winners in late June and early July, indicating active trimming of positions. While proceeds were redeployed into other stocks (rotation), the letter describes this as moving away from limiting valuations rather than net new deployment. Cash remained below 3% throughout, suggesting the activity was rotation rather than cash raising, but the explicit reduction of exposure to a major theme (AI) that had driven performance indicates modest de-risking. The rotation into pessimistic stocks is capital-neutral. Net effect is modest de-risking from high-performing areas, warranting a score slightly below neutral.
Forward Guidance
The manager's forward actions are selective and measured. While expecting AI spending to increase in 2027, the manager is actively reducing exposure to AI winners where valuations limit upside. The redeployment into excessively pessimistic stocks shows willingness to act but is framed as disciplined value investing rather than aggressive deployment. The language 'we believe the opportunity for further upside is more limited' and the active trimming of positions indicates a cautious deployment bias. This is selective adding with clear constraints, warranting a score just above neutral.
Language Signal
The letter uses balanced language with both opportunity and risk framing. Positive terms include 'strong returns,' 'solid execution,' 'favorable end markets,' and 'durable' applications. Risk-oriented language includes 'temporary pricing power,' 'excessive pessimism' (used as an opportunity), 'limited upside,' and 'cyclicality.' The manager frames market strength factually rather than enthusiastically. The net balance leans mildly positive given the acknowledgment of strong performance and favorable markets, but the cautious framing around valuations and temporary dynamics prevents a higher score.
Perceived Risk
The manager identifies specific risks around AI valuations reaching limiting levels and temporary pricing power in semiconductor-related stocks that could reverse. These risks are discussed with specificity (naming stocks, quantifying headwinds at 350 bps and 612 bps) but are framed as manageable through active portfolio management rather than systemic threats. The letter acknowledges cyclicality and valuation concerns but does not express alarm or warn of broader market risks. The risk discussion is present and substantive but not central to the letter's narrative, supporting a moderate risk perception score.
Opportunity Density
The manager sees selective opportunities, evidenced by the ability to redeploy proceeds from AI winners into stocks experiencing 'excessive pessimism.' The letter describes favorable stock selection across multiple sectors (Industrials, Materials, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples) and references 'solid execution and favorable end markets' for portfolio companies. However, the manager is also trimming positions where valuations limit upside, suggesting the opportunity set is not uniformly attractive. The characterization is selective rather than broad-based, with opportunities in defined areas (value-oriented stocks with strong returns on capital) but constraints in others (extended AI valuations). This supports a moderate-selective opportunity density score.
Time Horizon
The manager references 'durable' AI applications over 'the next few years' and focuses on companies with sustainable reinvestment opportunities, indicating a multi-year investment horizon. The avoidance of cyclical stocks despite near-term performance and the willingness to rotate away from recent winners toward pessimistic stocks suggests patience and a longer-term view. However, the letter also discusses quarterly performance in detail and references near-term catalysts (AI spending in 2027), indicating some attention to medium-term timeframes. The emphasis on returns on capital and reinvestment opportunities over cycles supports a multi-year but not permanent horizon, warranting a score in the 0.65-0.75 range.
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Kennedy Capital Management Mid Cap Value or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.
