Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Oct 30, 2026
For the period ending October 30, 2026, the WS T. Bailey Global Thematic Equity Fund recorded a 3-month net return of 0.38% and a 1-year net return of 10.22%, outperforming the IA Global Sector Mean of -0.04% and 7.33% respectively. Discrete 12-month performance to September 2026 reached 16.89% net of fees compared to 13.36% for the peer group. The fund maintains a balanced portfolio posture, allocating 51.4% to global thematic equities, 11.5% to Japan equities, 9.5% to emerging markets equities, 6.5% to Pacific Basin equities, 5.7% to UK equities, 3.2% to US equities, 3.9% to private equity, 2.7% to commodities, and 5.7% to cash. Macroeconomic focus shifted abruptly from the projected scale of artificial intelligence to the substantial capital expenditure required to fund infrastructure development. This reassessment triggered an acute sell-off in technology and Asian semiconductor manufacturing, while equal-weighted equity benchmarks held up significantly better than market-cap-weighted indices. The managerial framework emphasizes navigating this transition by moderating reliance on pure-play technology leaders and identifying businesses capable of driving earnings expansion independently of mega-cap tech momentum. Performance dispersion across underlying strategies was wide during the month. Significant detractors included Baillie Gifford Pacific (-12.7%) and Polar Capital Artificial Intelligence (-12.3%), alongside cyclical corrections in listed private equity vehicles Chrysalis (-8.6%) and IP Group (-3.2%). Conversely, non-AI correlated allocations provided substantial downside protection, led by Polar Capital Global Insurance (+10.8%), WS Havelock Global Select (+2.6%), and Polar Capital Healthcare Opportunities (+2.5%). Strategy adjustments are actively shifting capital toward operational AI adopters and value-disciplined memory and chip suppliers.
Long-term capital growth is best achieved by blending specialist active managers to capture structural global themes while diversifying across uncorrelated earnings drivers.
Returns are expected to broaden beyond recent mega-cap tech leaders toward businesses with independent earnings drivers, operational AI benefits, and less demanding valuations.
Neutral / Balanced
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with T. Bailey Global Thematic Equity Fund or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.