Browse the world's most comprehensive database of hedge fund investor letters, sorted by recent quarter. Access primary source research from leading institutional managers.
Buyside Digest is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Wasatch Hoisington US Treasury Fund. This analysis is provided for institutional research purposes only and is not investment advice.
Fund Returns
QTD+2.34%
Annualized-3.08%
Positioning StanceCONSTRUCTIVE
GeographyUS, Global
Digest Analysis
Quick Take
"Hoisington maintains long-duration Treasury strategy despite recent underperformance, betting on deflationary forces from global capacity underutilization, AI's labor-displacing effects, restrictive Fed policy, and tariff-induced liquidity contraction."
Executive Summary
The Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund returned 2.34% in Q3 2025, outperforming the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index's 2.03% return due to declining long-term Treasury yields. However, the Fund declined 8.32% over the past 12 months versus a positive 2.88% for the Index due to rising yields during that period. The managers maintain their long-duration strategy with an effective duration of 20 years, expecting yields to trend lower due to powerful deflationary forces. These include declining capacity utilization globally since 2021-22, with idle plants across the U.S., EU, and China. AI represents a fundamentally different innovation that reduces rather than increases demand for labor, natural resources, and capital, creating disinflationary pressures. Federal Reserve policy remains restrictive with real world dollar liquidity at post-Covid lows. Tariffs and retaliation further reduce liquidity through profit squeezes and reduced international capital flows. Real Gross Output has decelerated to just 1% growth, confirming weaker economic conditions than GDP suggests.
Unlock Full Institutional Analysis
Sign in or create a free account to unlock full commentary, extracted equity pitches, and direct outbound manager source links with your 3 quarterly credits.
Algorithmic conviction, macroeconomic posture, and risk appetite signals extracted from this quarterly letter with qualitative explanations.
Signal Matrix
Market Conviction
85%
CautiousHigh
High Conviction (85%)
Very high conviction evidenced by maintaining extreme duration positioning (20 years vs 6 year benchmark) despite recent underperformance. The manager provides detailed theoretical framework and multiple supporting data points for their deflationary thesis, showing strong belief in their positioning.
Growth Outlook
20%
BearishBullish
Bearish (20%)
The manager expresses a pessimistic view of the economic environment, citing declining capacity utilization globally, weakening economic conditions masked by GDP, and multiple deflationary headwinds. They describe the economy as facing persistent challenges through 2025 and beyond.
Risk Appetite
40%
DefensiveAggressive
Defensive (40%)
Despite the bearish economic outlook, the manager maintains an aggressive duration bet with 20-year effective duration versus 6 years for the benchmark. This represents a concentrated, high-conviction positioning that could generate significant outperformance if their thesis proves correct.
Capital Deployment
10%
De-riskingDeploying
De-risking (10%)
The manager maintains their existing long-duration positioning without indicating significant changes in deployment. They remain committed to their strategy but don't describe active scaling or new deployment, suggesting steady-state positioning.
Forward Guidance
40%
CautiousExpansionary
Neutral (40%)
The manager expects continued economic weakness and deflationary pressures through 2025 and beyond, but frames this as supportive for their Treasury positioning. Their guidance is cautious on the economy but constructive for their strategy.
Language Signal
35%
BearishBullish
Bearish (35%)
Language emphasizes risks, headwinds, declining conditions, and deflationary pressures. Terms like 'idle plants,' 'liquidity-draining,' 'profit compression,' and 'financial stress' dominate the discussion, though the manager frames these as opportunities for their strategy.
Perceived Risk
75%
Low RiskElevated
Elevated Risk (75%)
High perceived systemic risk from multiple sources: declining global capacity utilization, restrictive monetary policy, tariff-induced liquidity contraction, rising bankruptcies, and AI-driven economic disruption. The manager identifies numerous interconnected macro risks.
Opportunity Density
30%
ScarceAbundant
Scarce (30%)
Limited opportunity set focused specifically on long-duration Treasuries. The manager sees opportunity in their narrow specialty but describes a challenging broader environment with widespread economic headwinds and limited attractive alternatives.
Time Horizon
80%
Short-TermLong-Term
Decade+ (80%)
Long-term patient capital approach evidenced by maintaining 20-year duration positioning despite recent underperformance. The manager discusses structural economic changes and expects their thesis to play out over extended periods, showing multi-year investment horizon.