Browse the world's most comprehensive database of hedge fund investor letters, sorted by recent quarter. Access primary source research from leading institutional managers.
Buyside Digest is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Mairs & Power – Power Fund. This analysis is provided for institutional research purposes only and is not investment advice.
Fund Returns
QTD+3.4%
YTD+12.92%
Annualized+11.53%
Positioning StanceCONSTRUCTIVE
Market CapLarge Cap
GeographyUS
Digest Analysis
Quick Take
"Disciplined compounder strategy deploying capital into competitively advantaged adopters and infrastructure providers while shedding cyclical exposure and exiting positions facing structural competitive headwinds."
Executive Summary
During the third quarter of 2026, the Mairs & Power Fund delivered a net-of-fees return of 3.40%, outperforming the S&P 500 Total Return Index benchmark return of 2.30% and the Morningstar Large Blend Index peer group return of 1.11%. Year-to-date, the strategy generated a 12.92% net return compared to 12.75% for the benchmark. Relative outperformance was primarily generated by stock selection across Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, and Communication Services, while stock selection in Information Technology and Materials alongside sector allocation acted as modest performance drags.
The investment team maintains a disciplined macroeconomic outlook amid persistent inflationary pressures driven by elevated energy prices, ten-year Treasury yields surpassing 5.25%, and mounting sovereign debt. Rather than chasing cyclical peaks in artificial intelligence infrastructure, the fund differentiates between commoditized hardware and durable technology adoption. Strategy positioning emphasizes high-quality compounders with pricing power and enduring competitive moats, while fixed income allocations remain focused on short-duration, high-grade corporate and municipal paper held to maturity.
Portfolio activity reflected valuation discipline and risk management across key holdings. The fund continued building its position in Waste Management (1.90% allocation) after AI-driven market rotations depressed non-tech compounders. Top contributors included nVent Electric (3.24%), Littelfuse (2.14%), and Taiwan Semiconductor (2.92%), whereas Alphabet (4.81%) and Apple (3.31%) detracted from relative performance. The fund executed complete exits in Sprouts Farmers Market and Clearfield, reallocating capital where risk-reward profiles remain superior.
Unlock Full Institutional Analysis
Sign in or create a free account to unlock full commentary, extracted equity pitches, and direct outbound manager source links with your 3 quarterly credits.
Algorithmic conviction, macroeconomic posture, and risk appetite signals extracted from this quarterly letter with qualitative explanations.
Signal Matrix
Market Conviction
62%
CautiousHigh
Moderate (62%)
The portfolio demonstrates moderate conviction backed by rigorous fundamental rationale for core positions like Waste Management and nVent Electric alongside decisive exits like Sprouts Farmers Market. However, the presence of numerous smaller legacy holdings and benchmark-aware positioning tempers overall concentration.
Growth Outlook
58%
BearishBullish
Neutral (58%)
The manager remains constructive on underlying corporate earnings resilience and sustained economic growth while acknowledging late-cycle earnings inflation and elevated valuation risks.
Risk Appetite
52%
DefensiveAggressive
Balanced (52%)
Positioning balances participation in secular secular growth drivers like AI infrastructure with conservative restraint against commoditized hardware and cyclical peaks.
Capital Deployment
55%
De-riskingDeploying
Net Neutral (55%)
Deployment activity was net balanced, characterized by scaling high-conviction compounders like Waste Management while fully liquidating positions in Sprouts Farmers Market and Clearfield.
Forward Guidance
60%
CautiousExpansionary
Neutral (60%)
Capital deployment is targeted selectively into AI adopters and non-AI defensives, with immediate divestment when company-specific investment theses break.
Language Signal
56%
BearishBullish
Balanced (56%)
The narrative balances favorable views on business productivity and earnings resilience against clear warnings regarding geopolitical conflicts, energy shocks, and fiscal deficits.
Perceived Risk
68%
Low RiskElevated
Elevated Risk (68%)
The manager highlights meaningful macro risks including $40 trillion in U.S. national debt, geopolitical escalation in the Middle East, high mortgage rates, and AI infrastructure demand cyclicality.
Opportunity Density
54%
ScarceAbundant
Selective (54%)
Compelling ideas are deemed selective rather than abundant, with the manager capitalizing on AI-driven market dislocations to accumulate non-tech compounders at favorable entry valuations.
Time Horizon
82%
Short-TermLong-Term
Decade+ (82%)
Investment frameworks explicitly prioritize multi-year compounders, holding fixed income instruments to maturity and evaluating equity earnings power across full market cycles.