Hedge Fund Database
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The curated database of hedge funds that publish investor letters. Research by geography, strategy, and schools of thought.
| # | Fund | Strategy | Style | Geography | AUM | Latest Letter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Jul 6, 2025
Seeking Winners reviews its Q2 2025 performance, delivering an 8.20% net return compared to the S&P 500's 10.94%. The letter contains deep reflections on portfolio position sizing, admitting to an aggressive sizing error in Computer Modelling Group (CMG) where the fund overestimated customer stickiness and execution predictability. Conversely, the manager outlines the strong thesis behind holding core compounders like Constellation Software, HEICO, and Gartner, which possess highly resilient and predictable recurring revenue streams. The letter also addresses and refutes the 'Vertical AI' disruption bear case, demonstrating that workflow integration and distribution moats protect incumbent vertical software leaders like AppFolio, which are successfully leveraging AI tools (e.g. Realm-X) to expand their services.
Maximizing returns through high-conviction, concentrated investments in exceptional recurring revenue business models (Vertical Market Software and niche industrials) managed by excellent capital allocators, optimized through rigorous and disciplined position sizing based on risk/reward profiles.
As the fund enters the latter half of 2025, they remain confident in their portfolio's positioning. They believe their measured and disciplined approach to capital allocation will serve them well in navigating potentially volatile market conditions.
High Conviction Bullish
Market Conviction
Growth Outlook
Risk Appetite
Capital Deployment
Forward Guidance
Language Signal
Perceived Risk
Opportunity Density
Time Horizon
Top Conviction Themes
Key Catalysts
Every insight in this database connects to the original source. Read the actual thesis, see the actual concerns, and make your own call.
Buyside Digest has no business relationship, partnership, agency, sponsorship, endorsement, or affiliation with Seeking Winners or any other manager whose content appears on the Service, except where expressly stated. We do not receive Manager Content directly from managers in most cases; content is collected from publicly available sources. Managers have not necessarily reviewed, approved, authorized, or endorsed our display of their content, our editorial commentary, our metadata extraction, or our classifications. Use of a manager’s name is for accurate attribution and identification purposes only, under principles of nominative fair use.
Buyside Digest does not independently verify the regulatory status, registrations, licensing, qualifications, credentials, or professional standing of managers whose content appears on the Service. We do not represent that managers are properly registered with applicable regulatory bodies, that their content complies with applicable securities laws, or that their performance representations are accurate. Inclusion of a manager in our database is based on the publicly available nature of their content, not on our verification of their regulatory status or content compliance. Users are responsible for conducting their own due diligence on any manager.
Performance data, returns, assets under management (“AUM”), and similar figures displayed on this page are sourced from publicly available manager communications (including investor letters), public filings, or other third-party sources. Buyside Digest does not independently verify performance figures, calculate returns, or audit manager-reported data. Such figures: May be selectively reported by the manager; May use non-standard calculation methodologies; May not reflect fees, expenses, taxes, or other costs; May be inconsistent across reporting periods; May be outdated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures should not be relied upon for investment decisions without independent verification. Users should request audited performance data directly from the manager and conduct their own due diligence.